HSCO 506 Quiz 1
HSCO 506 Quiz: Philosophical Foundations
HSCO 506 Quiz 1: Week 1 — Module 2: Week 2
- From the lecture discussion on ways of knowing truth, what can we say?
- The lecture talked about levels of integration. What is an incorrect statement from that discussion?
- The lectures in week one referred to Jay Adams (the founder of Nouthetic counseling) when discussing the biblical foundation/worldview of Christian counseling. What did the lecture emphasize in that discussion, based on Adam’s perspective?
- The lectures talked about the “two books” concept. What is a true statement from that lecture?
- The lecture emphasized that different generations typically have different worldviews. If we are counseling someone just coming into adulthood in the 21st century, what should we emphasize?
- In arguing for the value of integration, the lectures suggested the following:
- For the Christian counselor, epistemology, according to the lecture
- The lectures talked about worldview. A worldview is
- “Imago Dei” is an important concept in the study of integration, and was mentioned in the lectures. This term refers to
- Why are self-awareness and humility so important in integrative counseling?
- In contrast to a biblical worldview of counseling, a psychological worldview of counseling
- The lecture emphasized the importance of understand OUR worldview as a counselor in choosing the model of counseling we use. What can we say from the lecture?
- In the discussion on worldview, the lecture contrasted the “modern” and the “post-modern” worldview. If one held the post-modern worldview, which would be true?
- Finish this comparative key phrases with the correct sets of words: theology is to psychology as ____________ is to
- Christian counseling, based in theology, would identify sin as ultimately behind human problems. In contrast, psychology would emphasize
- The lectures provided a brief introduction to the models of integration (based on Niebuhr’s Christ and Culture). What did we learn from that introduction?
- If I am following the “earmarks” of integration laid out in the lectures, which of the following would I demonstrate?
- If we are trying to distinguish what “Christian” counseling is (vs. secular counseling), which statement is true from the lecture?
- The lecture emphasized that the way we interpret behavior has a lot to do with our worldview, and a lot to do with our expectations of our clients. What is true based on the lecture discussion?
- The lectures explain that ways of knowing (epistemologies) can be limited. What is a true statement based on that discussion?