GOVT 345 Quiz 4
GOVT 345 Quiz 4 Liberty University
GOVT 345 Quiz 4: Legal Realism, Law and Social Theory
- One function of the law, according to Llewellyn, is to ensure that universal principles of justice are followed.
- To Durkheim, the more mature a society the more collective.
- For Marx, law is an expression of the economic foundation of a society.
- Holmes put forth the “bad man” approach to judging the law: what are the consequences for breaking it?
- Pound saw society and the law as competing interests that needed to be balanced.
- Sociological jurisprudence is more jurisprudence than law. It is the use of sociological methods to understand the law.
- Pound was not opposed to precedent but wanted to add sociological data to the formula for deciding cases.
- To Holmes, the brooding omniscience governing common law is what gave the law its majesty.
- A right, according to Hagerstrom, comes into existence when a law is passed. That is, you only have a right to property because the law will arrest a thief.
- To Durkheim, the penal laws of primitive societies are more human and enlightened.
- Technically speaking, the sociology of law is like standing on a hill called “sociology” and trying to evaluate a distant hill called “law”.
- Legal realism says adjudication is about the application of deductive logic by impartial judges.
- For Ehrlich, law is an expression of society but jurists need only look at positive law.
- For Holmes, lawyers are basically hired guns.
- For Llewellyn, law is a stable, xed phenomenon.
- For Habermas, communication is the key to realizing human potential.
- Like Austin, Hagerstrom saw law as an expression of the sovereign will.
- Llewellyn opposed stare decisis as an imagination limiting custom.
- Weber’s Legal-Rational Authority is the least leader dependent model of his three.
- Llewellyn embraced law as a philosophical inquiry.
Other sets
Set 1
- Weber saw modern law as a compromise between interests.
- To Holmes, the law has absolutely no connection to morality.
- For legal realists, particularly of the Scandinavian school, Freudian psychology would provide sound explanations for why judges rule the way they do.
- Holmes had a progressive mindset—legal history is a record of man’s moral development.
- Weber’s Legal-Rational Authority is the least leader dependent model of his three.
- Like the legal positivists, legal realists see moral and legal inquiries as being inseparable.
- Legal realism can be summed as “law is as law does”.
- For Habermas, communication is the key to realizing human potential.
- For Llewellyn, law is a stable, fixed phenomenon.
- Llewellyn embraced law as a philosophical inquiry.
- Pound’s “law in action” can be compared to Ehrlich’s “living law”.
- Hagerstrom dismissed metaphysics outright.
- Like Shapiro, Llewellyn says law as an organized social activity or as social planning in pursuit of policy goals.
- Montesquieu was a forerunner of the law and social theory school.
- Like Austin, Hagerstrom saw law as an expression of the sovereign will.
- Axel Hagerstrom is the foremost American legal realist.
- To Holmes, the brooding omniscience governing common law is what gave the law its majesty.
- Lundstedt is not consequentialist but a deontologist.
- Pound saw society and the law as competing interests that needed to be balanced.
- For Holmes, the law is a mystery.
Set 2
- Weber’s Traditional Authority means that people are following an inspirational leader.
- To Durkheim, the penal laws of primitive societies are more human and enlightened.
- Llewellyn opposed stare decisis as an imagination limiting custom.
- For Marx, the law in bourgeois society is determined by the proletariat.
- A right, according to Hagerstrom, comes into existence when a law is passed. That is, you only have a right to property because the law will arrest a thief.
- Weber’s Legal-Rational Authority is the least leader dependent model of his three.
- Axel Hagerstrom is the foremost American legal realist.
- Montesquieu was a forerunner of the law and social theory school.
- According to legal realism, judges decide hard cases with reference to the Grundnorm found in precedent.
- Legal realism says adjudication is about the application of deductive logic by impartial judges.
- Legal realism can be summed as “law is as law does”.
- Pound’s “law in action” can be compared to Ehrlich’s “living law”.
- Pound saw society and the law as competing interests that needed to be balanced.
- Like the legal positivists, legal realists see moral and legal inquiries as being inseparable.
- To Durkheim, the more mature a society the more collective.
- Society causes law but law has no influence on society.
- Holmes’s “bad man” approach to the law proves he is not a consequentialist.
- Technically speaking, the sociology of law is like standing on a hill called “sociology” and trying to evaluate a distant hill called “law”.
- To Holmes, the brooding omniscience governing common law is what gave the law its majesty.
- For Llewellyn, law is a stable, fixed phenomenon.
Set 3
- American legal realists are more practical whereas the Scandinavians are interested in developing a more comprehensive theory.
- Pound’s “law in action” can be compared to Ehrlich’s “living law”.
- To Holmes, the law has absolutely no connection to morality.
- Llewellyn is considered the spiritual father of the American legal realist movement.
- Weber’s Traditional Authority means that people are following an inspirational leader.
- Holmes put forth the “bad man” approach to judging the law: what are the consequences for breaking it?
- Like Austin, Hagerstrom saw law as an expression of the sovereign will.
- For Marx, the law in bourgeois society is determined by the proletariat.
- For Marx, law is an expression of the economic foundation of a society.
- Axel Hagerstrom is the foremost American legal realist.
- Weber’s Legal-Rational Authority is the least leader dependent model of his three.
- For Habermas, communication is the key to realizing human potential.
- For legal realists, society is in a constant state of flux; law tries to keep up with it.
- Kelsen would approve of sociological jurisprudence.
- Llewellyn opposed stare decisis as an imagination limiting custom.
- Holmes had a progressive mindset—legal history is a record of man’s moral development.
- For Llewellyn, law is a stable, fixed phenomenon.
- Like the legal positivists, legal realists see moral and legal inquiries as being inseparable.
- Montesquieu was a forerunner of the law and social theory school.
- Llewellyn’s approach to law could be called “functionalism” because it asks “what functions does the law serve?”