APOL 620 Quiz 2

APOL 620 Quiz 2

APOL 620 Quiz 2 Liberty University

APOL 220 Quiz 2 Plantinga’s Free Will Defense, Augustine through Schlesinger

1. Feinberg holds that while compatibilism is logically consistent, incompatibilism is logically inconsistent.
2. Which of the following must Plantinga establish for his free will defense to go through?
3. The position that God knows what any human being would have done in any circumstance in which He placed them is known as
4. Why didn’t God create just the angels, according to Augustine? Because God is a God of
5. We thus as theists have permission to give our answer to the problem of good before we try to address the problem of evil. This follows from Augustine’s ultimate notion that
6. Pike holds that sometimes moral agents are in a position where they have enough of a ground to justify their not intervening or non-action at a time or place. When in this position, Pike says the person has a
7. Which of the following individuals is Feinberg closest to in his preferred understanding of the actual nature of human’s extent of human free will?
8. Mackie thinks that if it is possible for God to create a human being that freely does rightly, then
9. Schlesinger holds that there is no highest state of DDS (degree of desirability of state) that God can bring about for any particular human being.
10. “Leibniz’s Lapse,” according to Plantinga, is the faulty view of Leibniz that God could have made just any possible world that He had wanted.
11. Joseph Runzo, according to Feinberg, holds that for God to know the future, He must have justified true belief about the future; however, He doesn’t. Why does God not, according to Runzo?
12. According to Schlesinger, the level of ‘DDS’ (degree of desirability of state) that one enjoys is the same as saying the amount of what that one enjoys?
13. Plantinga agrees that there is a ‘best possible world’ that God can and will bring about.
14. Augustine held that what was the origin of evil, that is, what ultimately caused the first evil to enter the world?
15. According to Plantinga, it was

Set 1

1. Plantinga agrees that there is a ‘best possible world’ that God can and will bring
2. Augustine held that what was the origin of evil, that is, what ultimately caused the first evil to enter the world?
3. Feinberg holds that while compatibilism is logically consistent, incompatibilism is logically
4. Schlesinger holds that there is no highest state of DDS (degree of desirability of state) that God can bring about for any particular human
5. According to Schlesinger, the level of ‘DDS’ (degree of desirability of state) that one enjoys is the same as saying the amount of what that one enjoys?
6. The position that God knows what any human being would have done in any circumstance in which He placed them is known as
7. We thus as theists have permission to give our answer to the problem of good before we try to address the problem of evil. This follows from Augustine’s ultimate notion that
8. Which of the following individuals is Feinberg closest to in his preferred understanding of the actual nature of human’s extent of human free will?
9. “Leibniz’s Lapse,” according to Plantinga, is the faulty view of Leibniz that God could have made just any possible world that He had
10. Joseph Runzo, according to Feinberg, holds that for God to know the future, He must have justified true belief about the future; however, He doesn’t. Why does God not, according to Runzo?
11. Mackie thinks that if it is possible for God to create a human being that freely does rightly, then
12. According to Plantinga, it was
13. Why didn’t God create just the angels, according to Augustine? Because God is a God of
14. Pike holds that sometimes moral agents are in a position where they have enough of a ground to justify their not intervening or non-action at a time or place. When in this position, Pike says the person has a
15. Which of the following must Plantinga establish for his free will defense to go through?

Set 2

1. We thus as theists have permission to give our answer to the problem of good before we try to address the problem of evil. This follows from Augustine’s ultimate notion that
2. Feinberg holds that while compatibilism is logically consistent, incompatibilism is logically inconsistent.
3. The position that God knows what any human being would have done in any circumstance in which He placed them is known as
4. “Leibniz’s Lapse,” according to Plantinga, is the faulty view of Leibniz that God could have made just any possible world that He had wanted.
5. According to Schlesinger, the level of ‘DDS’ (degree of desirability of state) that one enjoys is the same as saying the amount of what that one enjoys?
6. Plantinga agrees that there is a ‘best possible world’ that God can and will bring about.
7. Joseph Runzo, according to Feinberg, holds that for God to know the future, He must have justified true belief about the future; however, He doesn’t. Why does God not, according to Runzo?
8. Mackie thinks that if it is possible for God to create a human being that freely does rightly, then
9. Why didn’t God create just the angels, according to Augustine? Because God is a God of
10. Schlesinger holds that there is no highest state of DDS (degree of desirability of state) that God can bring about for any particular human being.
11. Pike holds that sometimes moral agents are in a position where they have enough of a ground to justify their not intervening or non-action at a time or place. When in this position, Pike says the person has a
12. Which of the following must Plantinga establish for his free will defense to go through?
13. Which of the following individuals is Feinberg closest to in his preferred understanding of the actual nature of human’s extent of human free will?
14. Augustine held that what was the origin of evil, that is, what ultimately caused the first evil to enter the world?
15. According to Plantinga, it was