JURI 600 Quiz 3
JURI 600 Quiz 3 Who is Responsible?
- Boy flings lit cigarette into brush. A light breeze fans the flames toward the forest, and a large forest fire results. The boy caused the forest fire.
- Driver Vickie Volunteer gives her friend, Ally Alabama a ride to the Tennessee v. Alabama football game. VV wants to get there on time, so she exceeds the speed limit the entire way. Just as she and AA are getting out of the car at the stadium, a bolt of lightning strikes AA. VV caused AA’s injuries.
- The strict liability standard requires proof that the allegedly offending party acted negligently.
- Citizens are not held responsible for violating ex post facto laws.
- According to Hebrew law, if a man digs a pit and an animal falls into the pit and dies, the digger must pay for the dead animal.
- The Bible recognizes the Necessity Defense for theft.
- Ignorance of the law is never an excuse.
- Which of the following, according to Hebrew law, is true about the damage caused by a fire?
- Which of the following is a true regulation in Hebrew property law?
- Which of the following versions of the Insanity Defense is most difficult for the Defendant to establish?
- From a Biblical perspective, which of the following best describes the defect in the concept of Strict Liability?
- How did the British court respond to the Defendants’ appeals of their murder convictions in the case of Regina v. Dudley?
- According to Hebrew law, which of the following is necessary to impose the death sentence upon an owner of an ox?
- Which Insanity Test does the following statement reflect: “The rule . . . is simply that an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect.”
- According to Hebrew law, which of the following is true if a person allows one of his animals to eat the grain from another person’s field?
- Which of the following versions of the Insanity Defense comports most closely with the Biblical view on the nature of man?
- Which of the following is not consistent with a secular worldview on fault?
- In Buck v. Bell, which of the following were goals of Virginia’s forced sterilization law?
- Which of the following is not true about the development of the fault standard?
- What is the foundational presupposition of America’s tort system and criminal justice system?
- Which of the following did not challenge the idea that man is a moral agent who should be held responsible for his actions?
- How did the Court in Commonwealth v. Mochan respond to the Defendant’s argument on appeal that he could not be convicted of harassing a woman by telephone when such an offense was not declared a crime in any state statute?
- If a doctor performs a vasectomy on a male patient, and the patient later impregnates his wife, what civil action might the patient file against the doctor?
- In Buck v. Bell, which constitutional rights did Carrie Buck contend were violated by Virginia’s forced sterilization law?
- Which of the following is not consistent with God’s decision to punish Adam and Eve for eating the forbidden fruit in the garden of Eden?
- What is the basis of the presumption that all citizens know the law?
- If a doctor performs a vasectomy on a male patient, and the patient later impregnates his wife, what civil action might the patient file against the doctor?
- Which of the following is not consistent with God’s decision to punish Adam and Eve for eating the forbidden fruit in the garden of Eden?
- Is the Necessity Defense available in most jurisdictions in the United States?
- In Buck v. Bell, what was the Supreme Court’s holding and rationale regarding Virginia’s forced sterilization law?
Other sets
- Citizens are not held responsible for violating ex post facto laws.
- Boy flings lit cigarette into brush. A light breeze fans the flames toward the forest, and a large forest fire results. The boy caused the forest fire.
- According to Hebrew law, if a man digs a pit and an animal falls into the pit and dies, the digger must pay for the dead animal.
- Ignorance of the law is never an excuse.
- The Bible recognizes the Necessity Defense for theft.
- The strict liability standard requires proof that the allegedly offending party acted negligently.
- Driver Vickie Volunteer gives her friend, Ally Alabama a ride to the Tennessee v. Alabama football game. VV wants to get there on time, so she exceeds the speed limit the entire way. Just as she and AA are getting out of the car at the stadium, a bolt of lightning strikes AA. VV caused AA’s injuries.
- What is the basis of the presumption that all citizens know the law?
- In Buck v. Bell, which of the following were goals of Virginia’s forced sterilization law?
- According to Hebrew law, which of the following is necessary to impose the death sentence upon an owner of an ox?
- From a Biblical perspective, which of the following best describes the defect in the concept of Strict Liability?
- What is the foundational presupposition of America’s tort system and criminal justice system?
- Which of the following is not consistent with a secular worldview on fault?
- Which Insanity Test does the following statement reflect: “The rule . . . is simply that an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect.”
- According to Hebrew law, which of the following is true if a person allows one of his animals to eat the grain from another person’s field?
- Which of the following is a true regulation in Hebrew property law?
- Which of the following versions of the Insanity Defense is most difficult for the Defendant to establish?
- If a doctor performs a vasectomy on a male patient, and the patient later impregnates his wife, what civil action might the patient file against the doctor?
- Which of the following, according to Hebrew law, is true about the damage caused by a fire?
- How did the British court respond to the Defendants’ appeals of their murder convictions in the case of Regina v. Dudley?
- Which of the following is not true about the development of the fault standard?
- How did the Court in Commonwealth v. Mochan respond to the Defendant’s argument on appeal that he could not be convicted of harassing a woman by telephone when such an offense was not declared a crime in any state statute?
- Which of the following is a true regulation in Hebrew property law?
- Which of the following versions of the Insanity Defense comports most closely with the Biblical view on the nature of man?
- Which of the following did not challenge the idea that man is a moral agent who should be held responsible for his actions?
- In Buck v. Bell, which constitutional rights did Carrie Buck contend were violated by Virginia’s forced sterilization law?
- Which of the following, according to Hebrew law, is true about the damage caused by a fire?
- Which of the following is not consistent with God’s decision to punish Adam and Eve for eating the forbidden fruit in the garden of Eden?
- Is the Necessity Defense available in most jurisdictions in the United States?
- In Buck v. Bell, what was the Supreme Court’s holding and rationale regarding Virginia’s forced sterilization law?
Other sets
- The strict liability standard requires proof that the allegedly offending party acted negligently.
- The Bible recognizes the Necessity Defense for theft.
- Boy flings lit cigarette into brush. A light breeze fans the flames toward the forest, and a large forest fire results. The boy caused the forest fire.
- According to Hebrew law, if a man digs a pit and an animal fall into the pit and dies, the digger must pay for the dead animal.
- Driver Vickie Volunteer gives her friend, Ally Alabama a ride to the Tennessee v. Alabama football game. VV wants to get there on time, so she exceeds the speed limit the entire way. Just as she and AA are getting out of the car at the stadium, a bolt of lightning strikes AA. VV caused AA’s injuries.
- Citizens are not held responsible for violating ex post facto laws.
- Ignorance of the law is never an excuse.
- In Buck v. Bell, which constitutional rights did Carrie Buck contend were violated by Virginia’s forced sterilization law?
- How did the British court respond to the Defendants’ appeals of their murder convictions in the case of Regina v. Dudley?
- Which of the following versions of the Insanity Defense comports most closely with the Biblical view on the nature of man?
- In Buck v. Bell, which of the following were goals of Virginia’s forced sterilization law?
- From a Biblical perspective, which of the following best describes the defect in the concept of Strict Liability?
- What is the foundational presupposition of America’s tort system and criminal justice system?
- According to Hebrew law, which of the following is true if a person allows one of his animals to eat the grain from another person’s field?
- If a doctor performs a vasectomy on a male patient, and the patient later impregnates his wife, what civil action might the patient file against the doctor?
- Which of the following, according to Hebrew law, is true about the damage caused by a fire?
- Which of the following is not consistent with a secular worldview on fault?
- Which of the following versions of the Insanity Defense is most difficult for the Defendant to establish?
- Which of the following is not true about the development of the fault standard?
- Which of the following is a true regulation in Hebrew property law?
- What is the basis of the presumption that all citizens know the law?
- Which of the following is not consistent with God’s decision to punish Adam and Eve for eating the forbidden fruit in the garden of Eden?
- Which of the following, according to Hebrew law, is true about the damage caused by a fire?
- Which of the following is a true regulation in Hebrew property law?
- According to Hebrew law, which of the following is necessary to impose the death sentence upon an owner of an ox?
- Which of the following did not challenge the idea that man is a moral agent who should be held responsible for his actions?
- Which Insanity Test does the following statement reflect: “The rule . . . is simply that an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect.”
- How did the Court in Commonwealth v. Mochan respond to the Defendant’s argument on appeal that he could not be convicted of harassing a woman by telephone when such an offense was not declared a crime in any state statute?
- Is the Necessity Defense available in most jurisdictions in the United States?
- In Buck v. Bell, what was the Supreme Court’s holding and rationale regarding Virginia’s forced sterilization law?